Types of Plagiarism in Research Papers: Examples of Academic Plagiarism


Reading time
4 mins
Types of Plagiarism in Research Papers: Examples of Academic Plagiarism

I remember, in Grade 1, my teacher firmly admonishing me to not look into my neighbor’s book to find out what is “3 + 2”. So, I’ve often wondered how “grown up” researchers could copy another person’s work. Don’t they understand that this is plagiarism? How could they expect to get away with it? Plagiarism in academia isn’t a single, uniform concept. There are many types of plagiarism, and not all of them are cases of black and white.

AI and Plagiarism

When everyone around you is using ChatGPT and turning out flawless, sophisticated writing, why can’t you use an LLM (large language model) to write your research paper? That’s the burning question many researchers are asking today.  As per the guidelines from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, no AI tool can actually “write” a research paper. Being an author on a research paper means that you take responsibility for the accuracy and integrity of its content. An LLM or an AI-based tool can’t do that.

Other researchers also warn that AI-generated content can’t always be trusted. Ryan (2020) warns “even complex machines such as AI should not be viewed as trustworthy as this undermines the value of interpersonal trust, anthropomorphises AI, and diverts responsibility from those developing and using them.” Vaishya et al. (2023), in a study specifically on ChatGPT, concluded that it “may be useful in a limited manner […], however, researchers are advised to fact check all statements provided, keeping in mind its limitations.”

Do Journals Screen for AI in Submitted Papers?

Yes! BMJ, for example, warns authors that “We may, on a systematic or case by case basis, use screening tools pre-publication to assist with the identification of content generated (in whole or in part) through AI technologies. We may also use such tools post-publication.” Publishers like MDPI use tools like Ethicality to identify potentially AI-generated articles.

Bottom line: even if the journal you’re submitting to doesn’t explicitly ban you from using AI-generated text, you should not directly copy and paste an entire article from ChatGPT or any AI tool. And for now, NEVER use AI-generated images as a substitute for regular scientific figures. Publishers like Elsevier, for example, allow authors to use AI tools to “improve readability and language of the work” subject to “human oversight and control” but directly forbid the use of AI to create or alter images. Like plagiarism checkers such as iThenticate have become fairly widespread among journals, assume that AI screening tools will also become equally popular as part of the article screening process.

Other Types of Plagiarism to Watch Out For

Besides AI-related plagiarism, there are some other, less well-known types of plagiarism that researchers need to be careful about.

Mosaic Plagiarism: Definition and Example

Mosaic plagiarism occurs when you use a few synonyms for the original author’s text or make some minor grammatical modifications in it, without really altering the structure of the work or rephrasing it in your own words. You’re basically “patching up” the plagiarized text. Here’s an example:

Source text: Dimwitted disorder has been characterized by structural and functional abnormalities in the brain regions responsible for executive functioning.

Your text: Dimwitted disorder is characterized by structural and functional abnormalities in the brain regions that are responsible for executive functioning.

Self Plagiarism

Self-plagiarism occurs when you “recycle” your previous work extensively. Sometimes, this might be acceptable if you properly cite those works and clearly explain to the journal why you’ve heavily relied on them.

The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) published an interesting case study of an author who submitted a review article that had sentences and paragraphs duplicating their previous works. Ultimately, the review article was deemed to have self-plagiarism, and it was rejected from the journal in question.

Direct vs. Indirect Plagiarism

Do you really need an explanation of direct plagiarism? It’s copying someone else’s words into your research paper without proper attribution (like a citation). An even more egregious form of direct plagiarism is complete or global plagiarism: taking the credit for someone else’s writing. Like when a university student pays someone else to write their essay and then passes off the essay as their own.

Indirect plagiarism is also called “paraphrasing plagiarism.” Here, the writer uses someone else’s ideas, paraphrasing them but not giving the original author credit. Simply put, you’re plagiarizing someone else’s work if you’re presenting their arguments or ideas as your own work, even if you’re using your own words.

Be the first to clap

for this article

Published on: Sep 09, 2024

An editor at heart and perfectionist by disposition, providing solutions for journals, publishers, and universities in areas like alt-text writing and publication consultancy.
See more from Marisha Fonseca

Comments

You're looking to give wings to your academic career and publication journey. We like that!

Why don't we give you complete access! Create a free account and get unlimited access to all resources & a vibrant researcher community.

One click sign-in with your social accounts

1536 visitors saw this today and 1210 signed up.