Search Results for
scope and delimitations
Despite some obvious ethical concerns, AI has significant benefits in improving research quality and time if used with caution. This blogpost talks about it at length.
- Sneha Khedkar
- November 8, 2023
The conventional pre-publication peer review process is time-consuming and may not be favorable to all scientific disciplines. Some journals and publishers offer rapid publication to help authors…
- Jayashree Rajagopalan
- February 13, 2015
In this interview, Dr. Lee shares her perspectives on the current status of peer review in Korea and suggestions to improve research integrity.
- Juhyun Lee
- September 22, 2022
-
Asked by delelegn belaynewh on January 25, 2018
In this post, we will be talking about a few cases of rejection we’ve seen on the Editage Insights Q&A forum, how guidance by Editage senior editors helped them overcome challenging situations…
- Audrey Fernz
- June 29, 2021
As the Editor-in-Chief of Editage Insights, Clarinda Cerejo oversees the functioning of a global multilingual learning and discussion platform for researchers. She has over 11 years of experience…
- Andrea Hayward
- November 30, 2017
Metrics are important in research evaluation, but excessive focus on unreliable and rigid quantitative measures has diluted the nature and significance of research…
- Jayashree Rajagopalan
- July 23, 2015
Choosing between the active and passive voice can be particularly confusing in academic writing. This…
- Kakoli Majumder
- January 29, 2019
Peer review as we know it today has evolved through the years to accommodate different journals' management styles as well as the increasing volume of journal…
- Andrea Hayward
- September 14, 2017
Editage brings you in touch with a senior and highly experienced neuroscience editor, Nia, who guides you through your journey after rejection.
- Malvika Gaur
- April 8, 2022